|
Visionary
Solar Power Page
Sun
is on all day. Wind is not.(20%max.?)
Sun
is clean. Windmills are dirty
Solar
panels are energy & land efficient. Windmills are not.
Solar
Panels are quiet. Windmills are noisy.
Solar
Panels are low maintenance. Windmills are high maintenance.
Solar
Panels don't pollute & kill. Windmills do.
Solar
Panels produce cheap power. Windmills produce high priced power.
05/18/05
Wow!!
local inventor creates a solar powered 2 ton Air Conditioner
04/29/05
Its time for DHS
CC to get it in gear and rev up the economic development
committee they fired "for no reason"? We already got
a 24" waterline, 1 tank and 2 MSWD wells going south down little
Morongo. We need alternative revenue for things like
"Public Safety". Cant count on property tax and utility tax
forever. Another opportunity passes us by. Lets use some
of that RDA for some cheap power over there and help create some
industrial jobs in DHS area. MSWD can float the bond and
sell the water, sewer and CHEAP POWER. Or MSWD / DHS could
give the business's the solar panels on their own roof's at
a reduced financed rate).
Lets see some vision for once.
04/29/05
CA
senate passed SB1 out of energy committee.SB1 will give
Californians 10 years of incentives to put solar panels on their
home's and business's. Click
here for the story. Thanks to Bill Effenger for the
link.
04/28/05
Dear
Bill Effenger
Click
here for the link to the story on DWA solar panels running
their plant
This is near DHS. The
DWA will save $70,000/ year bill to edison. Why
couldn't we do this for the future industrial park near DHS.
MSWD could joint venture with DHS and be the bond writer
for RDA for new industrial projects in this park. Bring
jobs to DHS.
And
when we do all the work to put this together, Hank can even
stand up and take all the credit. :). To bad he wont be
there long enough to suck up the political gravy.
Below is a picture
of panels

Take care
Gabriel King
04/28/05
This
letter from Steve Sobotta is well worth the read. He has
some very excellent points! I bolded some of the juicer
portions.
Thanks,
Steve for your continued dedication to DHS!
SOLAR
ENERGY INDEPENDENCE IS WELL WITHIN OUR REACH
(Based on a recent editorial by Steve Sobotta to the Desert Sun)
In recent years, many Coachella Valley folks have been working
very hard to bring to the public's attention that viable solar
energy alternatives can become a reality for all Coachella Valley
residents. Proponents have included individual citizens
such as forward-thinking visionaries like Dick Cromwell in DHS
when he headed-up Sun Line Transit, private companies and a small
handful of elected officials promoting alternative energy.
Unlike the national political scene, our hope has been that on
a local level that the push for energy independence, as characterized
by solar power opportunities, would minimally be interfered with
by local opportunistic politicians. Our Valley's need for the
development of cottage industries in the area of solar energy
technology, can not allow itself to be be "married"
to, or held back due to irrelevant political considerations unrelated
to the positive benefits that research and development have thus
far achieved.
In stark contrast with the controversial problems windmill are
associated (i.e., concerns about contamination of our aquifers,
bird kill, noise, aesthetic destruction of the Coachella Valley
scenic vistas, et al), the development of solar alternatives
offers a multitude of opportunities that if implemented can really
set this Valley apart from other places (340+/- days
of sunshine per year), with plenty of land available for this
purpose. No negative issues have ever been associated with solar
arrays destroying the visual appearance of an area, or the killing
of endangered species, or contaminating water. Solar industry
research suggests that 100 acres could conceivably accommodate
enough solar panels to power around 43,000 homes. Of
course, the cost of the solar panels must be taken into consideration,
however volume purchasing would assure lower costs, and a 100-acre
piece of land could provide the power supplies of most of Desert
Hot Springs, Palm Springs, Cathedral City. This means that there
would be substantially less reliance on traditional electric providers
for all areas of the Coachella Valley.
Unlike conventional energy providers, there is no monopoly
on solar array production with many different manufacturers.
No doubt, this reality would prompt more interest by the larger
energy providers, Edison, PG&E, San Diego Electric and Power,
etc. Individual Valley communities, or through joint powers agreements
could create their own municipally (publicly) owned solar farms
to energize their communities, or they could be privately owned
to service individual subscribers. With energy independence,
just consider a major improvement in the quality of life for all
Valley residents, knowing how many residents would enjoy a return
to year-round heating of our swimming pools minus the punishment
of prohibitively high heating costs. Complaints are heard from
one end of the Valley to the other about the deluge of windmills
inundating the pass and the western Coachella Valley. Growing
sentiment suggests that Valley residents are no longer content
in simply containing the proliferation of windmills (that offer
little or no benefit to Valley residents, economic or other),
but rather their being phased-out entirely that is possible by
attrition through amortization, non-renewal of conditional use
permits (for non-compliance), with gradual replacement with non-threatening
solar farms.
The bottom line is that unlike political problems on a state or
federal level that we may not be able to influence, at least on
a local level in the Coachella Valley, "We the People"
can make some significant steps to regain control of our surroundings
and quality of life. Valley residents need to closely
monitor the actions of their locally elected representatives and
to frequently remind them who elected them and who they are to
serve. Aware of these very critical and very obvious quality of
life issues, especially our currently energy dependency, our elected
officials should be abundantly proactive in favor of research
and development of viable alternative energy sources that will
give back our residents some semblance of energy independence.
Our elected representatives should be in the front lines
vigorously supporting every possible opportunity to once again
make our valley an exceptional place to live. Again,
we may not be able to do much about the ill-effects of renegade
politicians on a state or national level, but if the public is
made aware of the wonderful opportunities that we have available
at our fingertips, surely we can make a difference locally and
make a positive difference that we can all live with.
Visionary
Solar Power Page
Any
statements from these letters should be verified prior
to being relied upon as being factual. We believe
that the information is true when we post it within these letters.
Even so, the reader should question and investigate the information
provided as to its truth fullness.
Even though we feel that the information is true, no one should
rely on any information provided until it is verified as correct.
The views represented within these letters are not
necessarily our opinion.
Please
Note: We will attempt to correct any information we find to be
false. We will not publish any information about a public figure
that we "believe" to be "False" or have "actual
knowledge of being false". (See Sullivan vs New York Times)
Please let us know if you find any information regarding any posted
statements herein. The information posted here has had a
very high probability of being factually correct. We have
tried to be diligent in our postings as to avoid any "reckless
disregard" for the information presented (expanded Sullivan Rule). The
letters are provided a "Matter of Public Concern" therefore
are "Common Law Privilege" (See Sullivan vs New York
Times). These letters are posted as citizen opinions under
the First Amendment Right. In 1974, Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc,
418 U.S. 323 there is no such thing as a false idea. Even
obvious sarcasm is not liable per 1988 ruling in Hustler Magazine
v. Falwell 485 U.S. 46. This forum of letters is a constitutional
privilege of "neutral reporting" per Edwards v. National
Audubon Society.
|