Desert Hot Springs Local News and Opinion from DHS friends Get desert local news from the number 1 source of breaking news in Desert Hot Springs

Return to FODHS Home Page

 

07/24/06 

An Open Letter To The Residents of
Mission Lakes Country Club

Enjoy The View 

What was once a view of San Jacinto and the Coachella Valley looking south from Mission Lakes Boulevard is now a view of a construction fence. And if you could look past the fence, you would see a view of a roughly graded, churned up 72 acres of land. What you won't see on the other side of that fence is construction. At least not any time soon.

In the ongoing saga of developers and development run amok and a city council looking the other way while all this takes place, the "developers" of the Vista Del Monte housing tract have obtained their grading permits from the City of Desert Hot Springs. With those permits in hand, they have erected a view-blocking construction fence, churned up the land and now have put their "entitled" parcel up for sale. They have no plans to build.

Meanwhile, we all get to look at this. That is San Jacinto in the background. It was a really nice view on the day this picture was taken. Clouds and sun casting patchwork patterns on the mountainside and surrounding hills, giving life to the term painted hills. But we digress. That's all in the past.

Until such time as that project sells and the buyer decides to begin construction, all of us will be looking at the scene below.

Enjoy your view residents of Mission Lakes Country Club and everyone else driving along this once scenic drive. For the interest of a few on the city council taking campaign contributions from developers to look the other way, the rest of us have to look at this. Yes, we would be looking at it if there was actual construction work going to begin. But soon that ugly fence would be replaced with a landscaped area. 

The point is this: If we are going to lose our views, then they must be lost to progress. Here we have an ugly construction fence and no progress. That's going backwards.

Return to FODHS Home Page

Funny 
Video Alert
Click Here for
President Bush's
Recent Border Speech

 

Immigrant Updates & Send  Faxes To Your Rep's 

Whistleblower Suit 

See FODHS Whistleblower Lawsuit Page
Former police chief, Roy Hill,  Kathy Ward & Laurie Sculley say they  were also fired for exposing Hanson land deal and salary contract. 
Ann Marie Gallant was also once fired for exposing corruption of the  Carson City Council 


New Spotlight On
DHS Blight Page

Legal stuff here!

Any statements from these letters should be verified prior to being relied upon as being factual. We believe that the information is true when we post it within these letters. Even so, the reader should question and investigate the information provided as to its truth fullness.   Even though we feel that the information is true, no one should rely on any information provided until it is verified as correct.   The views represented within these letters are not necessarily our opinion.

Please Note: We will attempt to correct any information we find to be false. We will not publish any information about a public figure that we "believe" to be "False" or have "actual knowledge of being false". (See Sullivan vs New York Times) Please let us know if you find any additional information regarding any posted statements herein.  The information posted here has had a very high probability of being factually correct.  We have tried to be diligent in our postings as to avoid any "reckless disregard" for the information presented (expanded Sullivan Rule). The letters are provided a "Matter of Public Concern" therefore are "Common Law Privilege" (See Sullivan vs New York Times).  These letters are posted as citizen opinions under the First Amendment Right. In 1974, Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc, 418 U.S. 323 there is no such thing as a false idea.  Even obvious sarcasm is not liable per 1988 ruling in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 485 U.S. 46. This forum of letters is a constitutional privilege of "neutral reporting" per Edwards v. National Audubon Society.